Britain introduced sanctions against the Russian military for the use of chemical weapons at the front
Category
Economics
Publication date

Britain introduced sanctions against the Russian military for the use of chemical weapons at the front

Government of Great Britain
Britain introduced sanctions against the Russian military for the use of chemical weapons at the front

Great Britain imposed sanctions against Russia's Radiological, Chemical and Biological Defense Forces and their leader, Igor Kyrylov, for using chemical weapons in the war against Ukraine.

Points of attention

  • Great Britain imposed sanctions against Russian troops for the use of chemical weapons in the war against Ukraine.
  • Russian troops have admitted to using chlorpicrin on the front, which violates the Chemical Weapons Convention.
  • Britain promises to continue to apply sanctions against Putin's regime and to support Ukraine in the fight for international law.
  • August witnessed more than 400 cases of hostile use of chemical munitions against the Ukrainian military.
  • Russia grossly violates the rules of war and international obligations by using chemical substances prohibited for use in military conflicts.

Britain introduced sanctions against the Russian Armed Forces for the use of chemical weapons in the war

As noted by the British government, Russian forces have admitted to using chloropicrin, a toxic substance first used during the First World War, which is a violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention and international law.

British Foreign Minister David Lammy emphasized that London will not be inactive in response to such violations and will continue to apply sanctions against the Putin regime. According to him, Russia uses inhumane methods, and Britain will not allow it to avoid responsibility.

Defense Secretary John Healy emphasized that Great Britain will continue to support Ukraine and punish violations of international law, pledging annual aid to Ukraine in the amount of 3 billion pounds.

In addition, sanctions were imposed against two Russian laboratories involved in the development of chemical weapons.

In August, the Russian army used more than 400 chemical munitions against the armed forces

As noted, 447 cases of the use of chemical munitions by enemy forces against the Ukrainian military were recorded in August.

From February 15, 2023 to August 24 this year, 4,035 such cases were recorded.

The General Staff explains that chemical munitions are used simultaneously with conventional means of fire damage.

For chemical attacks, the enemy uses substances K-51 and RG-VO, which are prohibited for use in war, as they are means of fighting riots.

The General Staff also reports that a large part of the enemy's ammunition contains dangerous chemicals of an unknown type.

Thus, Russia grossly violates the rules of warfare, neglecting the norms and obligations of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction.

Category
Ukraine
Publication date

The Russian army may change the priority of the offensive at the front

ISW analyzed the situation on the front
Source:  ISW

According to American analysts, the Russian command may prioritize an offensive on Konstantinovka in the spring and summer of 2025. This could slow down the advance of the Russian army in the Pokrovskoye direction.

Points of attention

  • The capture of Pokrovsk was an important operational objective for Russian forces in the Donetsk region.
  • However, the redeployment of forces to the Konstantinovka direction indicates a possible change in the enemy's plans.

ISW analyzed the situation on the front

The American Institute for the Study of War draws attention to the fact that the advance of Russian troops south and southwest of Pokrovsk has slowed down over the past two weeks.

What is important to understand is that the capture of Pokrovsk has been the main operational goal of the Russian army in the Donetsk region since February 2024.

The Russian military command could have redeployed elements of the 8th ZVA (Russian Combined Arms Army — ed.) to reinforce degraded Russian units in the Pokrovsky direction if Russia intended to continue to consider this task a priority in 2025.

According to American analysts, the redeployment of significant Russian forces to the Konstantinovka direction indicates that the Russian military command may have identified an offensive on Konstantinovka as a priority task for the spring and summer of 2025.

By the way, February 15 was the hardest day on the front in 2025. So, over the past 24 hours, there were 250 combat clashes between Russian invaders and Ukrainian defenders.

Photo: DeepState

Category
Politics
Publication date

Rubio mocks Putin and praises Zelensky after recent talks

US Department of State
Rubio mocks Putin and praises Zelensky after recent talks

Analysts, political scientists, and journalists are actively debating why US President Donald Trump's conversation with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky was shorter than Trump's conversation with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has finally explained everything.

Points of attention

  • Trump's conversation with Zelensky was shorter than with Putin, due to the possibility of direct communication without interpreters.
  • The difference in English proficiency affected the duration of the negotiations.

The State Department mocked Putin in a jewelry-like manner

According to the US Secretary of State, the conversation between Trump and Zelensky, which took place on February 12, lasted 45 minutes.

The head of the White House claimed that his conversation with Putin lasted for over an hour, and official Moscow even came up with a version of an hour and a half.

Marco Rubio decided to explain for the first time why this happened. As it turned out, the reason lies in the ignorance of the Russian dictator, who for decades as the “president” of Russia failed to learn English.

As for Volodymyr Zelensky, he has full control over it, which the head of the US State Department drew attention to.

The difference is that with Putin you have to have translators, and it takes forever back and forth. Zelensky speaks fluent English, and they can talk and communicate more directly, and it happens much faster.

Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio

Head of the US Department of State

By the way, on February 13, the Russian authorities officially confirmed that the Kremlin had started preparing a negotiating team that would organize a meeting between Putin and Trump.

By staying online, you consent to the use of cookies files, which help us make your stay here even better 

Based on your browser and language settings, you might prefer the English version of our website. Would you like to switch?