India is not yet ready to host the Peace Summit
Category
Politics
Publication date

India is not yet ready to host the Peace Summit

Narendra Modi and Vladimir Zelensky
Source:  Bloomberg

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not yet given his consent to hold the second Peace Summit on the territory of his country in accordance with the proposal of President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Points of attention

  • India has not yet given consent to host the second Peace Summit, highlighting the delicate balance it maintains between Ukraine and Russia for trade and diplomatic interests.
  • President Zelensky seeks support from countries of the Global South, including India, for the Peace Summit, emphasizing the importance of direct dialogue between Ukraine and Russia.
  • Holding the Peace Summit in India could be a crucial step in involving the country in resolving the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, despite India's skepticism towards Ukrainian peace initiatives.
  • India's position on the war between Russia and Ukraine is influenced by its relationship with both countries, particularly as a significant buyer of oil from Russia.
  • Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent statements reflect a diplomatic approach, advocating for dialogue over conflict and highlighting the complexities of India's role in the Peace Summit.

Can the second Peace Summit be held in India?

According to the publication, in order to hold the second Peace Summit on the territory of India, the country's authorities must sign a communique based on the results of the summit already held in Switzerland.

It is noted that President Volodymyr Zelenskyy plans to hold a second peace summit before the presidential elections in the United States in November.

Zelensky's goal is to receive support from the countries of the Global South.

Holding the second Peace Summit in India will be progress, as this country is suspicious of Ukrainian peace initiatives.

The article emphasizes that Zelensky seeks to secure the support of the 10 key points of the Peace Formula from as many countries as possible.

The implementation of the key points involves the withdrawal of units of the occupation army of the Russian Federation from the territory of Ukraine and the isolation of Russia before the start of direct negotiations regarding the cessation of armed aggression by the Kremlin.

However, the countries of the Global South, particularly India, demand that representatives of the aggressor country be present at the second Peace Summit.

Although Ukraine's position does not contradict the participation of Kremlin representatives in the Summit, Moscow itself has repeatedly emphasized that it does not intend to participate in it.

More than 100 countries participated in the first Peace Summit. The authors of the article note that the Summit in Switzerland did not justify Ukraine's hopes for increased global support.

In particular, there were no Chinese representatives in Switzerland. India, Indonesia and South Africa refused to sign the final communiqué.

According to the spokesman of the President of Ukraine, Serhiy Nikiforov, during the meeting with Modi, Zelensky raised this issue and called on India to join the signing of the communiqué.

India has not yet expressed readiness to host the Peace Summit
Narendra Modi and Volodymyr Zelenskyi

The wording in this document has already been narrowed to focus on specific issues—nuclear and food security and the return of abducted children and prisoners—to garner maximum support.

What is known about India's position regarding the war launched by Russia against Ukraine

The publication notes that India is trying to balance relations between Ukraine and Russia, as it is almost the biggest buyer of oil from the aggressor country.

The Indian government advocates direct dialogue between Kyiv and Moscow.

The Indian leader's visit to Kyiv followed a trip to Moscow last month for talks with Vladimir Putin.

This visit met with criticism from Ukraine and the USA.

But Modi told Zelensky this month that he had spoken to Putin — "looking him in the eye" — and told him that "now is not the time for war."

I clearly expressed my opinion that the solution to any problem cannot be found on the battlefield, - said the Prime Minister of India during the meeting with Zelenskyi.

Category
World
Publication date

Russia cynically announced the continuation of attacks on Ukrainian energy facilities

Zakharova
Source:  online.ua

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova accused Ukraine of striking civilian targets in Russia amid the fact that the occupiers do not stop terrorist attacks on Ukrainian cities.

Points of attention

  • Russian Foreign Ministry accuses Ukraine of attacking Russian targets, while continuing attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure.
  • Ukrainian General Staff reports provocations by Russia aimed at disrupting the negotiation process.
  • Maria Zakharova threatens Ukraine with new strikes on civilian infrastructure, claiming Kyiv's attacks on Russian facilities.

Russia cynically promised to continue aerial terror of Ukraine

Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova threatened Ukraine on March 22 with new strikes on civilian infrastructure because Kyiv was allegedly attacking peaceful Russian facilities.

Despite the US-initiated agreement not to strike energy infrastructure facilities, which Kyiv supposedly officially supported, the Nazi regime's treacherous attacks on Russian territory continue, Zakharova falsely stated.

On March 19, an oil depot in the Kuban was hit, and on March 21, the Sudzha gas metering station in the Kursk region. In addition, there have been other barbaric cases of the Ukrainian Armed Forces deliberately targeting residential buildings and social institutions, a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry cynically stated.

It is obvious that with such antics, Kyiv is once again demonstrating its complete inability to negotiate, as well as its lack of desire to achieve peace. As in 2022, provocations have once again been launched with the aim of disrupting the negotiation process.

Zakharova brazenly warned Ukraine that “the Russian side reserves the right to respond, including a symmetrical one.”

The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine previously stated that the Russians themselves struck the gas pipeline in Sudzh, in order to later blame Ukraine. This is part of the Kremlin's discrediting campaign to create fakes and mislead the world community. The Russians, in turn, do not stop terrorizing the civilian population of Ukraine with drone and missile attacks, in particular, aimed at energy facilities, for a single day.

As stated by Andriy Kovalenko, head of the Center for Countering Disinformation at the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, the Russian Federation has already demonstrated at all levels that it has no intention of ceasing fire, violating the agreements from the first minutes.

Russia itself broke the ceasefire, it itself lied to Trump, but is trying to blame Ukraine for violations and present this as permission to continue the strikes that Russia has not stopped and continues to inflict on Ukrainian infrastructure. It is important to demonstrate at all levels that it was Russia that broke its promise to Trump to cease fire from the very first minute.

Andriy Kovalenko

Andriy Kovalenko

Head of the Central Development Center

By staying online, you consent to the use of cookies files, which help us make your stay here even better 

Based on your browser and language settings, you might prefer the English version of our website. Would you like to switch?