Putin began to create a new type of oligarchs in Russia — Reuters
Category
Economics
Publication date

Putin began to create a new type of oligarchs in Russia — Reuters

Putin
Source:  Reuters

Western journalists came to the conclusion that the Russian Federation's war against Ukraine led to the emergence of a new type of rich people in the aggressor country. In general, this process is controlled by the dictator Vladimir Putin.

Points of attention

  • The oligarchs of the new generation work in the consumer goods and services sectors, which distinguishes them from former businessmen.
  • Russian billionaires lose the opportunity to influence the country's politics and do not have the right to vote, because everything depends on Putin.
  • It is known that the new type of oligarchs in Russia cannot expand their ambitions due to tight control from the Kremlin.

Putin wants tame and submissive oligarchs

It is important to understand that the illegitimate president of the Russian Federation immediately after coming to power started a non-public war with the oligarchs of the 1990s.

After that, he appointed a new generation of tycoons — most often chosen from among his old colleagues from the Russian special services.

However, journalists and analysts are now documenting the emergence of a third wave of would-be oligarchs: tycoons chosen by Putin to own and manage assets confiscated from Western companies.

They may be more business-savvy, but they will be just as subordinate to the Russian leader as their predecessors, Reuters emphasizes.

A new type of rich people in Russia. What is he

According to journalists, one of the key differences between the new breed of oligarchs and the billionaires of the 1990s and 2000s is that they work in the consumer goods, services and retail sectors.

It is worth paying attention to the fact that the sectors of mineral resources and energy, which are under the strict control of the dictator, have long been distributed among the elders.

But the main distinguishing feature of the new generation is that they operate in a radically new context. While the former business elite depended on the domestic economy, which participated in world trade and was immersed in the global financial system, now Russia is cut off from foreign loans, the report says.

In addition, it is emphasized that newly minted billionaires do not influence the policy of the aggressor country in any way and de facto do not have the right to vote.

Their ambitions will have no way out due to the clear awareness that everything Putin gave, he can take away.

Category
Politics
Publication date

Former US ambassador calls Trump's fatal mistake regarding Russia

Trump chose the wrong path
Source:  Espresso

US President Donald Trump is making a serious mistake by leaning toward the idea of resetting relations with Russia, warns John Herbst, the 5th US Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Ukraine and director of the Eurasian Center at the Atlantic Council.

Points of attention

  • Trump is “flirting” with Russia and Putin and does not think about the consequences for the United States.
  • There is currently no final decision in Washington, but the situation is worsening.

Trump chose the wrong path

John Herbst draws attention to the fact that Russia's national security doctrine directly names the United States as its main adversary.

In general, Putin's team has never hidden this, but for Trump, even this is not an argument.

At the same time, there is a sense of naivety among the presidential advisers. One of them, as you mentioned, for some reason believes that it is possible to reset relations with Russia. This was a failed idea of the Obama administration. This group, surrounded by Trump, ridicules Obama for being soft, criticizes Biden, but at the same time repeats the same mistake — flirts with the idea of a reset, "Herbst emphasized.

In his opinion, it didn't work then and it won't work now.

Herbst also warned that Trump's approach, aimed at resetting relations with Russia, could be very damaging to US interests and his own reputation.

The situation is still evolving. There is no final decision in Washington yet, but this option is undoubtedly under consideration, the ex-ambassador added.

By staying online, you consent to the use of cookies files, which help us make your stay here even better 

Based on your browser and language settings, you might prefer the English version of our website. Would you like to switch?