Point of no return. Pashinyan again challenged Putin
Category
Politics
Publication date

Point of no return. Pashinyan again challenged Putin

Armenia has many claims to the CSTO
Source:  Armenpress

According to Armenian leader Nikol Pashinyan, his country is close to passing the point of no return in the issue of final withdrawal from the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).

Points of attention

  • Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan is considering the possibility of the country's withdrawal from the Collective Security Treaty Organization.
  • Pashinyan also does not reject the possibility of Armenia joining the EU, but emphasizes the need for real chances and prospects for the country.
  • Continuation of the democratic course will help bring Armenia closer to the EU and Western partners.

Armenia has many claims to the CSTO

As the head of the Armenian government noted, his country has accumulated many unanswered questions regarding the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).

Moreover, at present official Yerevan even considers it a threat to the statehood of Armenia.

We have frozen membership in the CSTO not only because the CSTO does not fulfill its security obligations towards Armenia, but also because, in our opinion, the CSTO poses threats to Armenia's security, its future existence, sovereignty and statehood.

Nikol Pashinyan

Nikol Pashinyan

Prime Minister of Armenia

Despite this, the head of government has not yet made a decision regarding Armenia's final withdrawal from the CSTO.

Pashinyan does not believe that Yerevan will ever hear the answers to all its questions.

Until we hear these answers, Armenia will move further and further away from the CSTO. There is a saying that this is the point of no return. And if we haven't passed it yet, there is a high probability that we will pass this point, said the Prime Minister of Armenia.

Can Armenia become a member of the EU?

What is important to understand is that currently Nikol Pashinyan does not reject the scenario according to which Armenia will take a course towards joining the EU.

However, for this, official Yerevan must see real chances for membership and prospects.

We need to be very careful in formulating the problems so as not to create new frustrations for the people on the way to solving these problems. It is also necessary to physically imagine Armenia's membership in the EU, the Armenian leader emphasized.

According to Pashinyan, Armenia's continuation of its democratic course will bring it closer to the EU and other Western partners.

Category
Economics
Publication date

Subsoil Agreement. What the US demanded from Ukraine before signing

the US
Source:  FT

Ukraine and the United States faced "last-minute" obstacles to signing a rare earth minerals agreement: a dispute arose over previously reached agreements.

Points of attention

  • The US wants Ukraine to sign both a framework agreement and a detailed document on the establishment of the fund.
  • Ukraine cannot sign both documents on April 30 because the fund agreement must be ratified by the country's parliament before it can be signed.

What does the US want from Ukraine before signing a subsoil agreement?

The Financial Times article states that problems arose when First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy Yulia Sviridenko flew to Washington - the team of her American colleague Scott Bessant told her that she should "be ready to sign all the agreements or return home."

The US wants Ukraine to sign both a framework agreement and a detailed document on the creation of a fund that will allow for the completion of the minerals agreement as a whole, Ukrainian interlocutors say.

The Ukrainians said the U.S. account was inaccurate and that they could not sign both documents on Wednesday because the fund agreement must be ratified by the country's parliament before it can be signed.

According to the publication's source, today, April 30, negotiations on the signing were not completed because Kyiv sought to revise the terms agreed over the weekend. At the same time, US officials are concerned because they believe this will reduce transparency. However, the document can still be signed if the Ukrainian side returns to the original terms.

A Ukrainian official who participated in the negotiations expressed disappointment with the American side and suggested that it "will not be satisfied with anything."

He added that the chances of a deal are slightly better, at 50/50.

By staying online, you consent to the use of cookies files, which help us make your stay here even better 

Based on your browser and language settings, you might prefer the English version of our website. Would you like to switch?