China outrages after EU decides to impose fees on Chinese electric cars from July 4
Category
Economics
Publication date

China outrages after EU decides to impose fees on Chinese electric cars from July 4

China
Source:  Politico

On June 12, the European Commission officially announced that starting July 4, it will introduce fees on imports of Chinese electric vehicles of up to 38.1%. Beijing immediately expressed its outrage and shock.

Points of attention

  • The decision is part of a months-long investigation into state aid to Chinese electric car manufacturers.
  • The Chinese Chamber of Commerce in the EU has expressed shock and disappointment at the protectionist measures, vowing to defend its rights.
  • Official Beijing is convinced that fees on electric cars will become a serious market barrier.
  • The EU and China are gradually entering a full-scale trade war, which could have far-reaching consequences for both economies.

The EU will introduce large-scale fees on Chinese electric cars

What is important to understand is that the imposition of fees should come after a months-long investigation into state aid to Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers.

Experts say the move could trigger a full-scale trade war between the EU and China after Beijing launched an investigation into European alcohol producers and threatened retaliation against EU farmers and aircraft companies.

When our partners violate the rules, we will defend our rights, said the European Commissioner for Trade, Valdis Dombrovskis.

According to the latest data, models produced by BYD face a duty of 17.4%, Geely - 20% and SAIC - 38.1%

How China reacted to the EU decision

The Chinese Chamber of Commerce in the EU was among the first to comment on the situation.

It immediately declared her "shock, deep disappointment and deep dissatisfaction with this protectionist measure."

In addition, representatives of the chamber harshly criticized the anti-subsidy investigation and even called it a "witch hunt."

Official Beijing is convinced that the fees will become a "serious market barrier".

After Germany's desperate bid to keep fees as low as possible failed, Berlin appears to have lost its battle with Paris. France insisted on high fees and was behind convincing the European Commission to launch an investigation last fall, the report said.

Category
Politics
Publication date

End of Russia's war against Ukraine. Rubio demands Putin make a decision

Rubio
Source:  Public

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the administration of President Donald Trump expects Russia to be ready to end the war, which should be known "in weeks, not months." Now the Russian side is violating the ceasefire.

Points of attention

  • US Secretary of State Marco Rubio calls on Russia to end the war against Ukraine in the coming weeks, urging prompt action.
  • Discussions between Ukraine and Russia involve measures to prohibit strikes on energy facilities, yet ceasefire violations persist.
  • The United States, Ukraine, and Russia are engaged in talks aiming to implement agreements on non-attack clauses for energy facilities.

Rubio demands that Russia make a decision to end the war against Ukraine

He told reporters after a meeting of NATO ministers.

If there is a wait-and-see tactic, we will not be interested in it. And President Trump will not fall into the trap of endless negotiations.

Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio

US Secretary of State

According to Rubio, Russia should make a decision to end the war “soon, not in six months, but in weeks.” If it does not, the United States should reevaluate its tactics.

He also added that the Russians did not agree to a full ceasefire, instead putting forward the idea of a partial truce, but they have already been violated several times.

It's about action. […] If you are not interested in peace, then you delay the process, you come up with some excuses... We will not delay this.

The United States, Ukraine, and Russia have published the results of technical-level talks held in Saudi Arabia on March 23-25. All parties agreed to develop measures to implement the agreement on the prohibition of attacks on energy facilities in Russia and Ukraine.

The Ukrainian side has handed over to US representatives a list of energy facilities that Russia should not strike. Meanwhile, the Kremlin has published a list of Russian and Ukrainian facilities that, by agreement of the parties, cannot be shelled during the 30-day ceasefire.

The very next day, March 26, the Russian Ministry of Defense accused Ukraine of violating the agreements on a mutual ceasefire at energy facilities. The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine stated that this was untrue. And during a massive attack on the night of March 28, Russian troops damaged Naftogaz's gas production facilities.

By staying online, you consent to the use of cookies files, which help us make your stay here even better 

Based on your browser and language settings, you might prefer the English version of our website. Would you like to switch?