In the United States, those accused of the September 11 terrorist attacks have pleaded guilty in exchange for the abolition of the death penalty
Category
World
Publication date

In the United States, those accused of the September 11 terrorist attacks have pleaded guilty in exchange for the abolition of the death penalty

US Department of Defense
In the United States, those accused of the September 11 terrorist attacks have pleaded guilty in exchange for the abolition of the death penalty

The person accused of preparing terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 entered into a plea deal with the investigation.

Points of attention

 

  • The deal with the investigation involves admitting guilt in the murder of 2,976 people committed during the terrorist attacks in New York, the Pentagon and in a field in Pennsylvania.
  • Prosecutors stressed that the deal was aimed at providing justice for the families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks.
  • The length of negotiations between the accused and prosecutors was 27 months before reaching an agreement.
  • The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 provoked the beginning of the fight against global terrorism and increased attention to the leader of "Al-Qaeda" - Osama bin Laden.

The accused in the terrorist attacks of September 11 agreed to plead guilty

According to the agreement, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who is considered the ideologist of the terrorist attacks, and his accomplices Walid bin Attash and Mustafa al Hawsawi pleaded guilty.

The New York Times writes that the defendants have agreed to plead guilty in in exchange for the abolition of the death penalty and life imprisonment.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (photo — wikipedia.org)

In exchange for dropping the death penalty as a possible penalty, the three defendants agreed to plead guilty to all of the crimes they were charged with, including the murders of 2,976 people listed in the indictment, the letter, signed by Rear Admiral Aaron K. Rugh, the chief prosecutor, said in the cases of military commissions, and three lawyers from his team.

The letter also said the men could file their appeals in open court as early as next week.

Prosecutors said the deal was intended to bring some "finality and justice" to the case, especially for the families of the nearly 3,000 people who died in the attacks in New York, the Pentagon and on the field in Pennsylvania.

The defendants' negotiations with prosecutors lasted 27 months at Guantanamo Bay and were approved Wednesday by the top Pentagon official overseeing the military tribunal.

Terror attacks on September 11

On September 11, 2001, suicide bombers hijacked four passenger liners. Two of them headed for the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York.

Another hijacked plane rammed the Pentagon building and another crashed in a deserted field near the city of Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

At the same time, the fight against global terrorism began. Osama bin Laden, who headed Al-Qaeda, became the main object of attention of American special services. The FBI offered a $25 million reward for him.

As a result of terrorist attacks, 2,976 people died. The terrorist attack became the largest in history in terms of the number of victims.

Category
World
Publication date

Can NATO defeat Russia without US help — expert analysis

NATO is now much stronger than Russia

In the event of the US withdrawal from the Alliance, NATO countries will still have a powerful military potential that can protect them during a possible war with Russia. Turkey and its decisions in this context can play one of the main roles.

Points of attention

  • Austrian military expert Gustav Gressel's warning about Russia potentially having more soldiers reveals a concerning factor in the scenario of a NATO-Russia conflict.
  • Analysis of the numerical discrepancies in manpower, tanks, fighter jets, and artillery between NATO countries and Russia showcases the Alliance's superiority.

NATO is now much stronger than Russia

What is important to understand is that the armies of NATO member countries number over 2 million soldiers, while the aggressor countries of the Russian Federation currently have half the number of personnel.

As for tanks, the Alliance has about 6,700 of them, and Putin can only use 2,900.

Europeans have over 2,300 fighter jets in service, while Russia has slightly less than 1,400. The quantitative difference is especially large in artillery: European NATO countries have over 15,400 guns at their disposal, while the Russian Federation has 6,090.

Austrian military expert Gustav Gressel made a statement on this matter.

He warned that Russia may have more soldiers than is currently known.

According to experts, in the event of a war between NATO and Russia, Turkey may refuse to participate and provide military assistance due to its proximity to Moscow.

In this case, the Europeans' resources will be significantly reduced, as Turkey provides almost a quarter of the soldiers, over a third of the battle tanks, and almost 18% of the artillery.

Category
World
Publication date

Baltic states fear Russia's ceasefire against Ukraine

The Baltic States Do Not Believe That Russia Will Stop
Source:  Financial Times

The defense ministers of the Baltic countries are convinced that a ceasefire on the Ukrainian front will sharply increase the security threat to their region from the aggressor country Russia.

Points of attention

  • The Kremlin's plans to enhance military production and deploy additional troops near the Baltic states have raised alarm among Baltic defense officials.
  • The Baltic defense ministers emphasize the need for heightened vigilance and preparedness in the face of potential Russian military escalation following a ceasefire in Ukraine.

The Baltic States Do Not Believe That Russia Will Stop

Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are convinced that Russian dictator Vladimir Putin will not stop at Ukraine after the Trump administration concludes a ceasefire agreement.

As it became known recently, the Kremlin has already planned to increase military production and additional troops along the borders of the Baltic countries.

Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur has already made a statement on this matter.

"We all understand that once the war in Ukraine is stopped, Russia will very quickly redeploy its forces. This means that the threat level will also increase significantly very quickly," he said.

An identical statement on this matter was also made by the Head of the Lithuanian Ministry of Defense, Dovilė Šakalienė.

According to her, the aggressor country will use the time after the ceasefire to accelerate the buildup of its military potential.

They already have a huge, combat-trained army, which will become even larger,” said Dovile Šakaliėne.

By staying online, you consent to the use of cookies files, which help us make your stay here even better 

Based on your browser and language settings, you might prefer the English version of our website. Would you like to switch?