Moldovan President Sandu sworn in for second term
Category
Politics
Publication date

Moldovan President Sandu sworn in for second term

Moldovan President Sandu sworn in for second term
Source:  Newsmaker

On December 24, Moldovan President Maia Sandu officially took the oath of office for a second term.

Points of attention

  • Moldova continues its development under the leadership of President Maia Sandu, who was sworn in for a second term.
  • The President called for national mobilization to continue reforms and develop the country.
  • In the elections, Maia Sandu won with a convincing result over a pro-Russian candidate, receiving the support of both domestic and international observers.
  • World leaders warmly congratulated President Maia Sandu, positively assessing the electoral process in Moldova.
  • Despite interference from Russia and its agents, President Maia Sandu has stood by her conviction and continues to build the country on the path to prosperity.

Maia Sandu sworn in for second term as president

After taking the oath, Sandu gave a speech in which she highlighted the country's achievements despite numerous challenges, including the crises of recent years and the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

I worked with dedication during my first mandate, and I will continue with even greater will and energy. In 4 years, we have done together what was not possible in 30 years of independence.

Maya Sandu

Maya Sandu

President of Moldova

Sandu called for national mobilization to continue reforms and develop the country.

Move forward with confidence. Our Moldova is heritage, optimism, struggle, development, organization, will and ambition, the President emphasized.

The President noted that there is still much work to be done, and expressed confidence in Moldova's ability to overcome difficulties and continue on its path to prosperity.

Presidential elections in Moldova

On November 3, the second round of presidential elections was held in Moldova, where the main rivals were the incumbent President Maia Sandu and the candidate from the Party of Socialists, former prosecutor Oleksandr Stoyanoglou.

According to the voting results, Sandu won 55.35% of the vote and defeated her pro-Russian opponent.

World leaders congratulated Sandu on November 3 and 4, and international observers generally assessed the election process positively.

At the same time, Russia and its agents attempted to interfere in the electoral process to influence the results.

Among the examples of such interference, Councilor Sandu cited the organized transportation of voters from Transnistria, which is illegal under the Moldovan electoral code. As of 11:00, the turnout among Transnistrian voters had already exceeded the total for the entire first round.

Category
Economics
Publication date

"This is a disaster." Experts analyzed the new draft agreement on subsoil

What's wrong with the subsoil deal?
Source:  Politico

Analysts from Politico concluded that the "minerals game" that Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky's team launched to win the support of Donald Trump has turned into a political disaster for Ukraine.

Points of attention

  • The focus on squeezing money out of Ukraine rather than fostering post-war peace has strained the relationship between the two countries, raising concerns about the agreement's true intentions.
  • Despite the concerns raised by journalists and analysts, Ukraine is navigating the situation cautiously to avoid provoking further backlash from the US president.

What's wrong with the subsoil deal?

Journalists point out that official Kyiv used the proposal to extract precious metals to push the White House to continue supporting Ukraine amid its war with Russia.

However, the main problem is that Trump is only interested in Ukraine when it comes to squeezing money out of it, not helping to ensure a stable post-war peace.

"The precious metals offer was a clear security point for Ukraine. It has critical resources like titanium, uranium, and others. And if Russia gets those resources, it would be a disaster for Kyiv's allies," one insider said.

According to analysts, what the Trump team is seeking from Ukraine within the framework of the new draft agreement has already turned into a political disaster.

Ukraine may not even get all of the vast resources it promised. Moreover, extracting any minerals would cost billions and could take decades—not the timeframe Trump envisioned.

At the moment, Ukraine does not want to provoke another fit of anger from Trump, so Kyiv is not publicly criticizing this document.

However, Zelensky's team is still trying to carefully tweak the proposed agreement without irritating the US president.

By staying online, you consent to the use of cookies files, which help us make your stay here even better 

Based on your browser and language settings, you might prefer the English version of our website. Would you like to switch?