Finland's Stubb calls on NATO to prepare its armies for conflict with Russia
Category
World
Publication date

Finland's Stubb calls on NATO to prepare its armies for conflict with Russia

Stubb

Finnish President Alexander Stubb warned other NATO leaders about the need to prepare their armies for a potential conflict with Russia.

What Stubb said in his address to NATO

According to Finnish President Stubb, recent public warnings about Russian aggression outside of Ukraine are distracting European countries from what they should be focusing on immediate aid to Kyiv and training of its armed forces — although he does not believe that Moscow will attack NATO countries until 2030.

I'm a little worried about this rather belligerent talk that Russia is going to test the strength of Article 5 and that Europe is next in line. Let's prepare for this, but I think it is unlikely.

Alexander Stubb

Alexander Stubb

President of Finland

He called on all European states to "become more Finnish".

In other words, more prepared. "You have to prepare for the worst to avoid it," Stubb added.

The Finnish president stressed that Kyiv's support in the coming months is of paramount importance as Russian dictator Vladimir Putin "feels very confident" and has targeted a "window of opportunity" to breach Ukraine's defences before September.

Is NATO preparing for possible escalations?

As Business Insider found out, NATO headquarters are concerned about the growth of Russia's military power but still hope that a large-scale war between the Russian Federation and the Alliance can be avoided.

For example, the US special services do not currently see the danger of a Russian attack on NATO and believe that the Russian armed forces will need another five to eight years to restore the military power they had before the invasion of Ukraine.

Despite this, risk assessments differ because many top NATO officials believe that it will be difficult to avoid the Russian Federation's invasion of the Alliance's territory.

Earlier, the head of the NATO Military Committee, Admiral Rob Bauer, said that the alliance needs transformation and the West must prepare for an era in which anything can happen at any time, including the start of war.

His remarks were made against the backdrop of the delay or limitation of military aid to Ukraine from the United States and the European Union.

On January 16, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyi warned that the West's wavering support for Kyiv and fears of an escalation of the war with Russia could prolong hostilities for years.

Category
Ukraine
Publication date

Sikorsky named the best security guarantee for Ukraine

Sikorsky voiced his position
Source:  TVN24

Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski, reflecting on the defense of Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire with Russia, stated that the best guarantee of security for the country is the Ukrainian army.

Points of attention

  • Ukraine's well-equipped and experienced army, known for its use of drones, plays a crucial role in ensuring the country's security.
  • French leader Macron is contemplating deploying European forces in Ukraine, potentially along the Dnieper line, away from the front line.

Sikorsky voiced his position

The Polish diplomat reacted to the meeting of the leaders of the "coalition of the determined", which took place on March 27 in Paris.

What is important to understand is that the coalition is considering the possible deployment of "deterrence forces" in Ukraine in the future.

According to Sikorsky, his country will be in this coalition, but not physically in Ukraine itself.

There are various echoes of these negotiations, both at the level of staff representatives in Great Britain and at the political level in Paris. These concepts are still at the stage of agreement... The biggest, best guarantee of Ukraine's security is a brave and well-equipped Ukrainian army.

Radoslav Sikorsky

Radoslav Sikorsky

Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland

The head of Polish diplomacy once again reminded that the Armed Forces of Ukraine is the largest army in Europe, which has experience in waging this new type of war involving millions of drones.

What is important to understand is that French leader Emmanuel Macron is considering deploying a European contingent in Ukraine away from the front line, one option being deployment along the Dnieper line.

Category
Ukraine
Publication date

The Biden administration was furious and panicked over the sinking of the cruiser Moskva

Biden was afraid of Putin's reaction
Source:  The New York Times

On April 14, 2022, the Ukrainian military unexpectedly sank the missile cruiser "Moskva", the flagship of the Russian fleet. Only now it became known that this event actually shocked and frightened the team of former US President Joe Biden.

Points of attention

  • The Biden administration's concerns over the sinking of the cruiser Moskva reflect the delicate balance of power dynamics and political implications in the ongoing tensions between Russia, Ukraine, and the US.
  • The involvement of key military figures like Valery Zaluzhny and General Mark A. Milley in the history of US-Ukraine relations adds layers to the intricate web of international diplomacy and military strategies.

Biden was afraid of Putin's reaction

As journalists learned, in mid-April 2022, American and Ukrainian naval officers were conducting routine reconnaissance.

That's when they noticed something unexpected on their radar screens.

Then the Americans said, "Oh, this is "Moscow," and the Ukrainians immediately replied, "Oh my God. Thank you very much. Goodbye."

In fact, Ukraine destroyed the Russian flagship without consulting its American allies.

Americans were angry that the Ukrainians had not warned them about this; surprised that Ukraine had missiles capable of reaching the ship; and panicked because the Biden administration had no intention of allowing the Ukrainians to attack such a powerful symbol of Russian power.

Sinking of the cruiser "Moscow"

It is worth noting that in the early years of the war, relations between Ukraine and the United States were also complicated by tense relations between the then Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Valery Zaluzhny, and his American counterpart, General Mark A. Milley, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff.

By staying online, you consent to the use of cookies files, which help us make your stay here even better 

Based on your browser and language settings, you might prefer the English version of our website. Would you like to switch?