Ukraine's success in Crimea could mark war's end, Western analysts say
Category
Ukraine
Publication date

Ukraine's success in Crimea could mark war's end, Western analysts say

F-16
Source:  Business Insider

According to analysts, the most effective for Ukraine in the war may be attempts to return Crimea occupied by Russia.

Points of attention

  • Ukraine is actively preparing for strikes on Crimea using the F-16.
  • The return of Russian-occupied Crimea is becoming a central goal for Ukraine in the war, which could lead to the humiliation of Kremlin dictator Vladimir Putin.
  • The destruction of the Crimean bridge and air defense systems in Crimea can be an important victory for Ukraine and affect the further development of the conflict.
  • The deployment of S-500 air defence systems in Crimea increases tensions in the region and gives Ukraine the opportunity to use strategic aspects of control over the peninsula in negotiations.
  • Ukrainian attacks on the Russian army in Crimea demonstrate a successful strategy of training and cooperation with Western allies in intelligence and combat operations.

How Ukraine is preparing to strike Crimea with F-16

The publication notes that even at the beginning of this year, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy made it clear that the battle for Crimea occupied by Russia will be central to the criminal war unleashed by the Kremlin.

The authors of the article note that Ukraine's success in the fight for Crimea would be a powerful blow to Kremlin dictator Vladimir Putin.

Russia's defeat in Crimea would not be just a defeat, but a humiliation, says Olha Khvostunova, an employee of the Eurasian Program of the Institute of Foreign Policy Studies.

Over the past few weeks, the Ukrainian military has carried out a series of successful attacks on the facilities of the Russian army in the Russian-occupied Crimea.

In particular, several batteries of Russian S-300 and S-400 air defence systems were destroyed.

Belbek airfield near Sevastopol was also attacked.

According to Elina Beketova, an expert on democracy at the Center for the Analysis of European Politics, the Ukrainian military's strikes were successful thanks to thorough preparation and systematic work, as well as the help of Western allies in satellite and aerial reconnaissance.

At the same time, the Ukrainian military successfully destroys the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation.

Maria Snehova, a senior researcher at the Europe, Russia and Eurasia program of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, emphasizes that Crimea "is the key to Russia's access to the Black Sea and operations."

Crimea allows us to direct power to the rest of the Black Sea. Accordingly, containment of Russian naval positions in Crimea is critically important for Ukraine, the analyst emphasizes.

The authors of the article add that the destruction of the Crimean Bridge can become a very important symbolic victory for Ukraine and a real blow to Kremlin dictator Vladimir Putin.

According to analysts, the destruction of the bridge is "inevitable", and even the Russians understand it.

Frederick Mertens, a strategic analyst at the Hague Center for Strategic Studies, believes that by attacking air defence in Crimea, Ukraine is "preparing the ground" for future F-16 strikes.

Crimea is vulnerable. The Russians have relatively limited room for maneuver on the peninsula...Putin has a lot to lose, both politically and militarily. So if a limited number of fighters can make a real impact, then it is here — and over the Black Sea, which becomes fully accessible after the air defenсe in Crimea is dismantled, — the analyst emphasises.

As you know, Russia has relocated its state-of-the-art S-500 air defence system to the peninsula to protect the region from aircraft.

Russia cannot afford to lose Crimea. This gives Ukraine the opportunity to use the threatening status of Crimea as a bargaining chip in future negotiations, — Maria Snehova notes.

At the same time, Beketova is convinced that if Ukraine can regain control over the Black Sea, return the peninsula, or simply exert enough pressure on these territories to threaten Putin, "this will mean the end of the war."

What is known about the S-500 systems deployed by Russia in Crimea

The occupation army of the Russian Federation has deployed advanced S-500 Prometheus air defence systems in Crimea.

According to Newsweek, it is currently unclear which parts of the S-500 air defense system Russia has transferred to the occupied peninsula.

The authors of the material note that it also remains unknown how many S-500 systems Russia has in service.

Currently, Russia has at its disposal one active S-500 regiment, which usually involves the presence of two battalions with two anti-aircraft batteries in each, that is, a total of four of them, — explains Siddharth Kaushal, a researcher at the Royal United Services Institute think tank.

The first S-500s were deployed in the vicinity of Moscow in the fall of 2021.

The first S-500s were deployed in the vicinity of Moscow in the fall of 2021. However, Ukraine's constant strikes against Russia's ground-based air defense systems in Crimea, in particular the S-400, have forced Moscow to move weapons to protect its bases and infrastructure, and "further strikes by Ukraine against such air defense facilities may render the peninsula unsuitable for the deployment of Russian troops, — representatives of the American analytical center Institute for the Study of War note.

According to Paul van Hooft, a strategic analyst at the Hague Center for Strategic Studies, deploying parts of the S-500 could be an interim solution to the problem of losing the S-300 and S-400, filling gaps in capability and allowing Russia to test parts of the S-500 without losing an entire battery.

Category
Politics
Publication date

Hungarians receive false information from the authorities regarding Ukraine's accession to the EU

The Hungarian government
Source:  European truth

The Hungarian government, along with ballots for a "survey" of Hungarians about Ukraine's membership in the EU, has spread its counterarguments, which are based on manipulation and outright lies.

Points of attention

  • The Hungarian government is spreading false arguments and manipulation tactics to create a negative perception of Ukraine's accession to the EU among Hungarians.
  • The counterarguments provided by Budapest lack scientific support and are based on blatant lies, aiming to influence public opinion.
  • Ukraine's adoption of European norms is a requirement for EU accession, debunking claims such as the threat of the Ukrainian mafia infiltrating Europe, as presented by the Hungarian government.

Orban is being manipulated on the issue of Ukraine's accession to the EU

Hungarian government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs announced on March 29 that Hungarians had begun sending out ballots for a "survey" along with an information sheet outlining seven "risks" of Ukraine's accession to the EU from Budapest's perspective.

The first risk is that in the event of Ukraine's membership, Hungary will allegedly lose EU funding, "and all the money will go to Ukraine" (why "all" is not explained).

In addition, Brussels is calling for huge joint borrowing, which indicates that we will all become debtors together due to Ukraine's accession, says the Hungarian government video (which also does not explain what kind of borrowing is involved and how it is related to Ukraine).

Other "risks", according to Hungary, are related to the fact that Ukraine is a huge producer of agricultural products, so after accession "all EU funds will go to Ukrainian farmers", and the European market will be "open to low-quality, genetically modified Ukrainian goods".

At the same time, the Hungarian government ignores the fact that accession to the European Union requires Ukraine to adopt all European norms, including in the field of agriculture, so this statement is a blatant lie.

The Hungarian government spokesman also claims, without evidence, that Ukraine was "the center of drug trafficking and organized crime in Eastern Europe" even "before the war," so "accession to the EU will open the way for the Ukrainian mafia to enter Europe, and therefore Hungary."

Budapest's other arguments are that after Ukraine joins the EU, Ukrainians, as a cheap labor force, will "threaten jobs and pensions" in the European Union.

Ukrainians will also threaten public health because "there is no mandatory vaccination in Ukraine" (in fact, there is mandatory vaccination in Ukraine), and "Ukraine's hasty accession to the EU" will jeopardize the payment of the so-called 13th pension by the Orban government.

Such polls do not actually have legal force, and only a small percentage of Hungarian voters (up to 30%) actually participate in them. At the same time, Orbán's government often refers to the results of such polls as evidence that its policies have public support.

Category
World
Publication date

Pentagon chief Hegseth invites his relatives to closed meetings with foreign military personnel

Hegset

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth took his wife, former Fox News producer Jennifer Hegseth, and his brother Philip to several meetings with foreign military colleagues where confidential information was discussed.

Points of attention

  • Pete Hegseth's decision to include his wife and brother in confidential meetings at the Pentagon and NATO headquarters has raised serious concerns about security protocols being violated.
  • The presence of relatives at high-level discussions with foreign military colleagues has sparked outrage among employees and questioned the integrity of the information shared.
  • Jennifer Hegseth's access to classified information during these meetings has come under scrutiny, posing a potential threat to security and trust within the defense community.

Hegset brings relatives to meetings where confidential information is discussed

It is known that Jennifer Hegseth was present at the February meeting of defense ministers at NATO headquarters, during which the Contact Group on Defense Issues for Ukraine also met.

The wife of the US Secretary of Defense was also spotted at a meeting on March 6 at the Pentagon with British Defense Secretary John Healy and British Chief of the General Staff Admiral Tony Radakin.

According to WSJ sources, some foreign participants in the meetings did not know who Jennifer Hegset was; others were surprised by her presence but did not express open objections.

Although Hegset has the authority to grant outsiders a certain level of access to classified information discussed in meetings with foreign colleagues, it is unclear whether he did it for his wife.

Pentagon sources confirmed to the publication that Jennifer Hegseth is not an employee of the US Department of Defense. And Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell responded to the WSJ that "it is quite clear to me that your story will be full of inaccuracies and will not be written in good faith."

Hegseth's younger brother, Philip, who produces conservative podcasts and recently started working for the US Department of Homeland Security, also accompanies the Pentagon chief to some meetings.

The two traveled to Guantanamo together in February and are currently on a tour of US Asian allies.

The WSJ report comes amid heightened attention to Pete Hegseth's role in a Signal messenger chat room that shared intelligence about the US military operation in Yemen — and where The Atlantic journalist was mistakenly added.

By staying online, you consent to the use of cookies files, which help us make your stay here even better 

Based on your browser and language settings, you might prefer the English version of our website. Would you like to switch?